DIDACTICS AS A FORMATIVE STRATEGY FOR NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHERS IN RURAL SCHOOLS

Authors

  • Alix María Rojas Prado
  • Jeyson Quintero López

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56219/dialctica.v4i26.4910

Keywords:

Didactics, natural science teachers, rural schools, formative strategy

Abstract

Teaching science in rural areas is more than just transmitting content; it involves transforming the school into a space where didactics becomes a bridge between knowledge, contexts, and communities. Consequently, this article offers a critical reflection on didactics as a formative strategy for Natural Science teachers in rural schools, with special reference to the reality of the department of Norte de Santander, Colombia. Methodologically, it is developed as an argumentative essay based on an analytical review of specialized literature and relevant case studies, discussing how structural limitations, scarce resources, and insufficient teacher training affect the quality of teaching in rural contexts. Among the main findings, it is demonstrated that didactics, understood as a mediator of cognitive and socio-emotional processes, is particularly important for re-signifying knowledge and teaching practices, fostering situated and contextualized learning. Likewise, obstacles such as the lack of professional development, resistance to change, and the weak articulation between educational policies and local realities are identified. Finally, it is concluded that strengthening didactics as a formative axis implies designing permanent training programs, integrating participatory methodologies, and reinforcing networks of pedagogical support—essential elements to consolidate relevant, inclusive, and transformative Natural Science education in the most vulnerable rural settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alix María Rojas Prado

Docente de la Institución Educativa Rural

Mesitas, Sede Guaimaral

Venezuela

Jeyson Quintero López

Docente de la Institución Educativa Rural

San Sebastián, Sede Maracaibo.

Venezuela

References

Arango, A, & Sanabria I. (2021). El método de estudio de casos en la enseñanza de las ciencias naturales. Praxis & Saber, 12(31), 1–17. www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S2216-01592021000400001&script=sci_arttext

Ausubel, D. (2000). The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View. Springer.

Bravo, O., y León, S. (2023). Inequidad en la educación rural en Colombia: Revisión de literatura. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(1), 7257–7274. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i1.4961

Brown, S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://www.csus.edu/indiv/s/stonerm/brown-collins-duguid--situatedcognitionandcultureoflearning.pdf

Bruner, S. (2009). The Process of Education. Harvard University Press.

Bybee, W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. NSTA Press.

Escorcia, H., Calonge, R., & Romero, B. (2020). El Entorno Natural como espacio de aprendizaje y estrategia pedagógica en la escuela rural. Revista de Estilos de Aprendizaje, 13(25), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v13i25.1491

Freire, P. (2023). Pedagogía del oprimido. Siglo XXI Editores.

Furtak, M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., y Briggs, D. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-23293-003

Galfrascoli, A., Lederhos, M., & Veglia, S. (2017). Prácticas educativas en educación rural: Enseñanza de las ciencias naturales. Investigación en la Escuela, (93), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2017.i93.04

Giroux, H. A. (2018). Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope: Theory, Culture, and Schooling. Routledge.

Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and Learning Science: A Guide to Recent Research and Its Applications. Open University Press.

Iturbe, P., y Quiceno, M. (2021). El docente rural como mediador cultural: Estrategias para resignificar el conocimiento científico. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 81(2), 90–110.

Loucks S., Stiles, E., Mundry, S., Love, N., y Hewson, P. (2018). Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Corwin Press.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (MEN). (2022). Política Integral de Educación Rural – Educación rinde cuentas. https://educacionrindecuentas.mineducacion.gov.co/pilar-1-educacion-de-calidad/politica-integral-de-educacion-rural/

Putnam, T., y Borko, H. (2020). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0013189X029001004

Rodríguez, M. (2024). Didáctica de las ciencias naturales: aporte teórico emergente desde el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico mediado con las tecnologías de la informática. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional Experimental Libertador (UPEL). https://espacio.digital.upel.edu.ve/index.php/TD/article/view/1284

Published

2026-02-09

How to Cite

Alix María Rojas Prado, & Jeyson Quintero López. (2026). DIDACTICS AS A FORMATIVE STRATEGY FOR NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHERS IN RURAL SCHOOLS. DIALÉCTICA, 4(26). https://doi.org/10.56219/dialctica.v4i26.4910