KEY PEDAGOGICAL PRINCIPLES FOR EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Keywords:
pedagogical principles, educational innovation, self-regulated learning, systematic review, content analysisAbstract
This study identifies ten key pedagogical principles for educational innovations based on a systematic literature review. The methodology was structured into five phases: formulation of research questions, database search (ERIC, SciELO, Google Scholar), definition of inclusion/exclusion criteria, selection and extraction of data, and synthesis of information. Sixteen documents were analyzed, including sources from the OECD, UNESCO, and APA, to identify patterns and trends. The principles are: 1) focus on the student and their learning; 2) consideration of starting points; 3) attention to values, affective, and motivational aspects; 4) communication of high expectations; 5) provision of scaffolding; 6) attention to individual differences; 7) recognition of the social nature of knowledge; 8) promotion of situated learning; 9) organization of the learning environment; and 10) formative assessment. These principles, supported by recent empirical evidence and leading theoretical perspectives, provide practical guidelines for transforming teaching and addressing the educational challenges of the 21st century. Future empirical validation is recommended to strengthen their applicability in diverse educational contexts.
Downloads
References
American Psychological Association. (2015). Top 20 principles from psychology for PreK–12 teaching and learning. Author. https://www.apa.org/ed/schools/teaching-learning/top-twenty-principles.pdf
Atjonen, P.; Korkeakoski, E.; Mehtalainen, J. (2011). Key Pedagogical Principles and Their Major Obstacles as Perceived by Comprehensive School. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17(3), 273-288. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13540602.2011.554698
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D. y Hanesian, H. (1983). Psicología Educativa: Un punto de vista cognoscitivo. Trillas.
Barab, S. A. y Duffy, T. (2012). From practice fields to communities of practice. In Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 29-65). Routledge.
Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J. y Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309-344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
Berliner, D. C. (1981). Academic learning time and reading achievement. Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews, 203-226. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED203299.pdf#page=208
Black, P. y Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Boell, S. K. y Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2019). Systematic literature reviews in information systems research: A critical review and guidelines for improvement. Journal of Information Technology, 34(2), 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.26
Braun, V. y Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Broadbent, J. y Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The internet and higher education, 27, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Burgess, S., Rawal, S. y Taylor, E. S. (2023). Teachers' use of class time and student achievement. VoxEU CEPR. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/teachers-use-class-time-and-student-achievement
Coubergs, C., Struyven, K., Vanthournout, G. y Engels, N. (2017). Measuring teachers’ perceptions about differentiated instruction: The DI-Quest instrument and model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.02.004
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992). Flow. The Psychology of Happiness. Rider.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B. y Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. DOI: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Dent, A. L. y Koenka, A. C. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 425-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8
Deunk, M.I., Smale-Jacobse, A.E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S. y Bosker, R.J. (2018). Effective differentiation Practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review. 24, 31-54, DOI:10.1016/J.EDUREV.2018.02.002
Díaz Barriga, F. (2003). Cognición situada y estrategias para el aprendizaje significativo. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 5(2). https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-40412003000200011
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P. y Pachan, M. (2020). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 91(4), 899-913. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
Fullan, M., Quinn, J. y McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world, change the world. Corwin Press.
Gillies, R. M. (2019). Promoting academically productive student dialogue during collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.014
Gobierno de México-Secretaría de Educación Pública (SEP) (2017). Modelo educativo para la educación obligatoria. SEP.
Gros, B. y Cano, E. (2021). Procesos de feedback para fomentar la autorregulación con soporte tecnológico en la educación superior: revisión sistemática. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(2), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.28886
Hargreaves, D. (2007). Teaching as a research-based profession: possibilities and prospects (The Teacher Training Agency Lecture 1996). Educational research and evidence-based practice (pp. 3-17). https://books.google.es/googlebooks/images/kennedy/insert_link.png
Hattie, J. y Donoghue, G. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. npj Science of Learning, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13
Hattie, J. y Zierer, K. (2019). Visible Learning Insights. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/97813510 02226
Herrington, J. y Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 48(3), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S. y Liu, L. (2019). Scaffolding in science education. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, y M. Reimann (Eds.), International Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 251-262). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617572-25
Hodgson, V. y McConnell, D. (2019). Networked learning and postdigital education. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0029-0
Husbands, C. y Pearce, J. (2012). What makes great pedagogy? Nine claims from research Schools and Academies. National College for School Leadership.
Jacinto, C. y Terigi, F. (2007). ¿Qué hacer ante las desigualdades en la educación secundaria? Aportes de la experiencia latinoamericana. Santillana.
Jansen, R. S., Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Jak, S. y Kester, L. (2019). Self-regulated learning partially mediates the effect of self-regulated learning interventions on achievement in higher education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100292
Johnson, D. W. y Johnson, R. T. (2019). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. In Active learning—Beyond the future. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086
Kirschner, P. A. y Hendrick, C. (2020). How learning happens: Seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429061523
Lave, J. y Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause Learning Initiative, 1(1), 1-12. https://alicechristie.org/classes/530/EduCause.pdf
Martínez-Garrido, C., y Murillo, F. J. (2016). Investigación iberoamericana sobre enseñanza eficaz. Revista mexicana de investigación educativa, 21(69), 471-499. https://lc.cx/rkkLRg
McCombs, B. y Vakili, D. (2005). A learner-centered framework for e-learning. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1582-1600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00534.x
McDaniel, M. A. y Einstein, G. O. (2020). Training learning strategies to promote self-regulation and transfer: The knowledge, belief, commitment, and planning framework. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1363-1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620920723
Mercer, N. y Howe, C. (2021). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 100456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational technology research and development 50(3), 43–59. https://lc.cx/s1tJnI
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H. y Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST. Recuperado de http://udltheorypractice.cast.org
Mishra, P. y Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Molloy, E., Boud, D. y Henderson, M. (2019). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
Murillo, F.J., Martínez Garrido, C.A. y Hernández Castilla, R. (2011). Decálogo para una Enseñanza Eficaz. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 9(1), 6-27. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55118790002
Nicol, D. J. y Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E. y Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16 (1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
OECD. (2017). The OECD Handbook for Innovative Learning Environments.
OECD, UNESCO, UNICEF (2016). La naturaleza del aprendizaje: usando la investigación para inspirar la práctica. https://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/20.500.12799/5421
OREALC/UNESCO-LLECE (2008). Eficacia escolar y factores asociados en América Latina y el Caribe. Salesianos Impresores. http://archivos.agenciaeducacion.cl/reporte_tematico_eficacia.pdf#page=205
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2016). Innovación educativa. Serie 'Herramientas de apoyo para el trabajo docente'. Autor. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247005
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos. (2012). La naturaleza del aprendizaje: usando la investigación para inspirar la práctica. Guía del practicante. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/The%20Nature%20of%20Learning.Practitioner%20Guide.ESP.pdf
Panadero, E. y Lipnevich, A. A. (2022). A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35, 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A. y Botella, J. (2019). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 28, 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100292
Puentedura, R. R. (2009). SAMR: A model for technology integration. Hippasus Blog. Recuperado de http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/
Ramírez; M. S. y Lugo, J. (2020). Revisión sistemática de métodos mixtos en el marco de la innovación educativa. Comunicar, 65(28), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.3916/ C65-2020-01
Ríos, P. (2021). Marco referencial para una evaluación formativa. Areté. Revista Digital del Doctorado en Educación de la Universidad Central de Venezuela. 7(13), 75–94. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8293885
Roa-Rocha, J. C. (2021). Importancia del aprendizaje significativo en la construcción de conocimientos. Revista Científica FAREM-Estelí Medio Ambiente Tecnología Desarrollo Humano, (Extra 0), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.5377/farem.v0i0.11608
Rubie-Davies, C. M. y Rosenthal, R. (2016). Intervening in teachers' expectations: A random effects meta-analytic approach to examining the effectiveness of an intervention. Learning and Individual differences, 50, 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.014
Ryan, R. M. y Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
Sánchez-Gómez, V. y López, M. (2020). Entendiendo el Diseño Universal desde el Paradigma del Soporte: el DUA como Sistema de Soporte al Aprendizaje. Revista latinoamericana de educación inclusiva, 14(1), 143-160. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-73782020000100143
Slavin, R. E. (2020). How evidence-based reform will transform research and practice in education. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1611432
Subban, P., Suprayogi, M.N., Preston, M., Nanda Liyani, A. y Purnama Ratri, A. P. (2024). Differentiation is Sometimes a Hit and Miss. Educator Perceptions of Differentiated Instruction in the Higher Education Sector. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(4), 873–884 DOI:10.1007/s40299-024-00904-8
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.G. y Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261–292 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
Torrano, F., Fuentes, J. y Soria, M. (2017). Aprendizaje autorregulado: estado de la cuestión y retos psicopedagógicos. Perfiles educativos, 39(156), 160-173. https://www.iisue.unam.mx/perfiles/articulo/2017-156-aprendizaje-autorregulado-estado-de-la-cuestion-y-retos-psicopedagogicos.pdf
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., ... y Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
UNESCO. (2010). Atención y educación de la primera infancia, informe regional. América latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile. https://lc.cx/DnPo7m
UNESCO. (2020). El enfoque de aprendizaje a lo largo de toda la vida: Implicaciones para la política educativa en América Latina y el Caribe. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373632_spa
UNESCO. (2021) Reimaginar juntos nuestros futuros. Un nuevo contrato social para la educación. Informe de la comisión internacional sobre el futuro de la educación. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379381_spa
Van der Kleij, F. M. y Adie, L. E. (2023). Formative assessment and feedback in the classroom: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 93(1), 73-110. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221105567
Van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M. y de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. Sage Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Vezub, L. y Alliaud, A. (2012). El acompañamiento pedagógico como estrategia de apoyo y desarrollo profesional de los docentes noveles. OEI. https://lc.cx/crgWlo
Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Grijalbo.
Wang, H. S., Chen, S. y Yen, M. H. (2021). Effects of metacognitive scaffolding on students’ performance and confidence judgments in simulation-based inquiry. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 020108. https://lc.cx/U94cor
Wang, M. T. y Degol, J. (2016). School climate: a review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review 28, 315–352 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K. y Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
Wood, D., Bruner, J. y Ross, G. (1976). The rol of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of children psychology and psychiatry, 17, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman y D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-36). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601032
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Investigación y Postgrado está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 .
La política de acceso abierto y de licencias con “algunos derechos reservados” no niega la propiedad intelectual ni los derechos de los autores respecto a sus artículos, al contrario, los respeta. Es por ello que:
No se reservan los derechos de publicación de los artículos. Los autores podrán distribuir su artículo en cualquier otro medio, siempre y cuando sea sin fines de lucro. Debe informar al Editor de esta nueva publicación y debe dar el crédito a la revista Investigación y Postgrado.
