CRITICAL THINKING AS A DRIVING FORCE IN LESSON PLANNING FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.

Authors

  • Nardy Elizabeth Torres

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56219/dialctica.v1i31.6270

Keywords:

Critical Thinking, Computational Thinking, pedagogical Planning, Teacher Professional Development, Primary Education.

Abstract

This research report aims to analyze the impact of critical thinking and computational thinking on pedagogical planning among primary basic education teachers. The study was conducted under a quantitative approach, using a cross-sectional experimental design with a descriptive scope, in order to identify changes in lesson planning resulting from the implementation of a formative strategy mediated by digital resources. The participants were primary education teachers who engaged in a professional development process focused on strengthening higher-order cognitive skills such as analysis, reflection, decision-making, and logical organization of ideas. Data collection involved the application of planning evaluation instruments before and after the intervention, allowing for a comparative analysis of changes in learning objectives, didactic coherence, and the sequencing of instructional activities. The results indicate that the intentional integration of critical thinking and computational thinking significantly improves pedagogical planning, promoting greater coherence among objectives, activities, and assessment, as well as the design of structured and contextualized learning situations. Additionally, the findings show that technological tools acquire pedagogical value when they are embedded within a clearly defined formative strategy oriented toward reflective teaching practice. It is concluded that lesson planning constitutes a strategic space for the transformation of teaching practices and that the articulation of critical thinking, computational thinking, and teacher professional development fosters sustainable processes of pedagogical innovation in primary basic education.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nardy Elizabeth Torres

Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador (Upel-Rubio)

References

Area, M., Santana, P., & Sanabria, A. (2020). La transformación digital de la educación: Formación docente y competencia digital. Comunicar, 28(63), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.3916/C63-2020-01

Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2022). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education: Implications for policy and practice. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/305141

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Díaz-Barriga, F., & Hernández, G. (2022). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo: Una interpretación constructivista (5.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Education.

Huber, C. R., & Kuncel, N. R. (2022). Does college teach critical thinking? A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 431–468. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315605917

Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2021). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016

Jara, O. H. (2012). La sistematización de experiencias: Práctica y teoría para otros mundos posibles. Centro de Estudios y Publicaciones Alforja.

Kong, S. C., Abelson, H., & Lai, M. (2020). Computational thinking education in K-12: Artificial intelligence literacy and physical computing. MIT Press.

López-Aymes, G. (2021). El pensamiento crítico en la educación básica: Retos para la formación docente. Perfiles Educativos, 43(171), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2021.171.59418

Moreira, M. A. (2018). Aprendizaje significativo: Fundamentos teóricos y aplicaciones pedagógicas. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 20(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.2.1632

Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2021). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning.Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609

Ortuño-Meseguer, G., & Serrano, J. L. (2024). Formación del profesorado de educación primaria en pensamiento computacional: Una revisión sistemática. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 27(1), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.27.1.37572

Pimienta-Prieto, J. H. (2020). Planeación didáctica por competencias: Fundamentos y aplicaciones. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 22(1), Artículo e01. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2020.22.e01.2150

Saiz, C., & Rivas, S. F. (2020). Pensamiento crítico y formación del profesorado: Fundamentos, estrategias y evaluación. Revista de Educación, (389), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2020-389-457

Tiruneh, D. T., Guyla, A., De Cock, M., & Elen, J. (2020). The effectiveness of explicit instruction in critical thinking: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 30, 1003–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100325

Zapata-Ros, M. (2015). Pensamiento computacional: Una nueva alfabetización digital. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), (46), 1–47. https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/240321

Zapata-Ros, M. (2021). Pensamiento computacional y educación: Una revisión sistemática. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(2), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.29105

Published

2026-09-16

How to Cite

Nardy Elizabeth Torres. (2026). CRITICAL THINKING AS A DRIVING FORCE IN LESSON PLANNING FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS. DIALÉCTICA, 1(31). https://doi.org/10.56219/dialctica.v1i31.6270

Issue

Section

Portafolio de Investigación