CRITICAL THINKING AS A DRIVING FORCE IN LESSON PLANNING FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56219/dialctica.v1i31.6270Keywords:
Critical Thinking, Computational Thinking, pedagogical Planning, Teacher Professional Development, Primary Education.Abstract
This research report aims to analyze the impact of critical thinking and computational thinking on pedagogical planning among primary basic education teachers. The study was conducted under a quantitative approach, using a cross-sectional experimental design with a descriptive scope, in order to identify changes in lesson planning resulting from the implementation of a formative strategy mediated by digital resources. The participants were primary education teachers who engaged in a professional development process focused on strengthening higher-order cognitive skills such as analysis, reflection, decision-making, and logical organization of ideas. Data collection involved the application of planning evaluation instruments before and after the intervention, allowing for a comparative analysis of changes in learning objectives, didactic coherence, and the sequencing of instructional activities. The results indicate that the intentional integration of critical thinking and computational thinking significantly improves pedagogical planning, promoting greater coherence among objectives, activities, and assessment, as well as the design of structured and contextualized learning situations. Additionally, the findings show that technological tools acquire pedagogical value when they are embedded within a clearly defined formative strategy oriented toward reflective teaching practice. It is concluded that lesson planning constitutes a strategic space for the transformation of teaching practices and that the articulation of critical thinking, computational thinking, and teacher professional development fosters sustainable processes of pedagogical innovation in primary basic education.
Downloads
References
Area, M., Santana, P., & Sanabria, A. (2020). La transformación digital de la educación: Formación docente y competencia digital. Comunicar, 28(63), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.3916/C63-2020-01
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2022). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education: Implications for policy and practice. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/305141
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Díaz-Barriga, F., & Hernández, G. (2022). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo: Una interpretación constructivista (5.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Education.
Huber, C. R., & Kuncel, N. R. (2022). Does college teach critical thinking? A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 431–468. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315605917
Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2021). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016
Jara, O. H. (2012). La sistematización de experiencias: Práctica y teoría para otros mundos posibles. Centro de Estudios y Publicaciones Alforja.
Kong, S. C., Abelson, H., & Lai, M. (2020). Computational thinking education in K-12: Artificial intelligence literacy and physical computing. MIT Press.
López-Aymes, G. (2021). El pensamiento crítico en la educación básica: Retos para la formación docente. Perfiles Educativos, 43(171), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2021.171.59418
Moreira, M. A. (2018). Aprendizaje significativo: Fundamentos teóricos y aplicaciones pedagógicas. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 20(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.2.1632
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2021). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning.Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
Ortuño-Meseguer, G., & Serrano, J. L. (2024). Formación del profesorado de educación primaria en pensamiento computacional: Una revisión sistemática. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 27(1), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.27.1.37572
Pimienta-Prieto, J. H. (2020). Planeación didáctica por competencias: Fundamentos y aplicaciones. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 22(1), Artículo e01. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2020.22.e01.2150
Saiz, C., & Rivas, S. F. (2020). Pensamiento crítico y formación del profesorado: Fundamentos, estrategias y evaluación. Revista de Educación, (389), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2020-389-457
Tiruneh, D. T., Guyla, A., De Cock, M., & Elen, J. (2020). The effectiveness of explicit instruction in critical thinking: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 30, 1003–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100325
Zapata-Ros, M. (2015). Pensamiento computacional: Una nueva alfabetización digital. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), (46), 1–47. https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/240321
Zapata-Ros, M. (2021). Pensamiento computacional y educación: Una revisión sistemática. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(2), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.29105
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La revista Dialéctica conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, que favorece y permite la reutilización de los mismos bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 , por lo cual se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que se cite la autoría y fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial, URL y DOI de la obra), no se usen para fines comerciales u onerosos y se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la misma licencia del original.









